"Jewett, Jim J" <jim.jewett at eds.com> writes: > Jeff Bone: > >> Yet --- true, but only if one accepts a particular and rather >> simple-minded and overly-literal interpretation of the ***GOALS*** of >> PEP 318, > > That simple-minded and overly-literal interpretation may well > be correct. > > PEP 318 does not intend to change the semantics or capabilities > of the language in any way whatsoever. I just want to point out that Guido has been basically silent ever since this discussion re-started and it has now degenerated into a mostly-philosophical debate. I suggest it might be worth waiting for him to respond before it spirals any further away from what was asked for :) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4