At 11:50 AM 6/28/04 -0500, Jeff Bone wrote: >I wouldn't keep pushing on this except that I'm entirely puzzled about >what these legitimate "runtime" applications might be that aren't already >more easily and clearly accomplished with existing mechanisms: >arguments, lexical scope, and higher-order functions. I've already said this several times, and PEP 318 says it too: PEP 318 seeks a *syntax* that allows those "existing mechanisms" to be invoked at the *beginning of a function definition*. That is all. Period. Finito. End of story. So, to talk about applying restrictions to what behavior is allowed for decorators, is to completely miss the point of PEP 318. Please re-read PEP 318's "Motivation" section.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4