A.M. Kuchling wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:09:56AM -0400, Aahz wrote: > >>It was either discarded accidentally or never made it to the queue; I >>certainly didn't see it. I've had problems in the past with netnews >>posts to c.l.py.a failing, ... > > > Aha! I posted via slrn, so that's probably what's happened. That's > heartening; if it had been publicized properly, there would have been > even more participants. > > Question for Anthony: PEP 320 says "alpha 1 -- second week of July > 2004". Does this mean July 4-10 (first full week of July, but the > second week) or July 11-17 (second full week of July)? > > I was thinking of July 10th as the next bug day, making for one per > month, but if alpha1 is being released around that time, that date > won't work. If alpha1 is released around the 17th, are you OK with > having a bug day a week earlier, with the resulting spike of changes? > If not, then maybe June 26th will be a good choice. I was aiming at 7-8 July for alpha1. I see no problem with having the bug day a couple of days after the first alpha. -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4