Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > It miht sound stupid or useless, or maybe someone has already > mentioned > it but sometimes I wish Python could provdie an "Empty" > keyword like The > "None" one. > > It would be usefull to validdate the emptyness of any scalar > or sequence > in an uniform way instead of using things such as : > > if len(mylist) == 0: > > which I really dislike. Have you read the bit about empty lists and such when testing truth values? http://docs.python.org/lib/truth.html >>> x = [] >>> if x: ... print True ... else: ... print False ... False >>> x = [0] >>> if x: ... print True ... else: ... print False ... True Robert Brewer MIS Amor Ministries fumanchu at amor.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4