> Many times I find myself asking for a slice of a specific length, rather > than a slice with a specific end. I suggest to add the syntax > object[start:>length] (or object[start:>length:jump]), beside the > existing syntax. Feel free to continue to argue for this, but I'm -1, and that usually kills a proposal dead. I doubt that you'll be able to get enough influential people on python-dev to rally for your proposal; but I'm sure they will explain to you why your syntax is unpythonic and the feature is so minor as to be unneeded. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4