On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:27:58 -0400, Chris King <colanderman at gmail.com> wrote: > Given the proposed changes: > > 1) make a seperate eval loop that supports tail calls so as not to > impact performance of normal programs, > 2) force tail calls to be explicitly enabled using a run-time function call, > 3) print a warning in stack traces when tail calls are enabled and used. > > is Guido still -1 on this? Just a guess but "make a seperate eval loop" sounds like a sure way to get a 10,000 pound weight dropped on you? <wink> Seriously, how do you accomplish this without code duplication? Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4