Tim Peters wrote: > [Jim Fulton] > >>I still don't like it, because it hides the return. >> >>I'd rather do: >> >> if (self->foo != NULL && (vret = visit(self->foo, arg))) >> return vret; >> >>than >> >> VISIT(self->foo) > > > I don't believe you <0.5 wink>. Here, rewrite this: > > VISIT(self->readline); > VISIT(self->read); > VISIT(self->file); > VISIT(self->memo); > VISIT(self->stack); > VISIT(self->pers_func); > VISIT(self->arg); > VISIT(self->last_string); > VISIT(self->find_class); > return 0; How about if ( 0 || || VISIT(self->readline) || VISIT(self->read) || VISIT(self->file) ) return 1; -- chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4