Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) wrote: > OK - super raises. super_raise goes away, and there is no equivalent > for not raising. If people want that, they can subclass :) OK - I've updated the recipe to reflect this change. It makes the code a *lot* cleaner - it's almost readble now. I also discovered that I'd missed an infinite recursion bug (which I'd been explicitly guarding against ... but then managed to mess up). Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4