Raymond Hettinger wrote: > [David Eppstein] > >>In another place I used the dictionary directly >>but it amounted to the same thing. > > > All respondents prefer having a dictionary (elements mapped to counts) > instead of an itertool returning (cnt, elem) ... > > Just to be clear before I do it, does everyone support having > dict.countkeys() as a dictionary classmethod instead of the original > proposal? > I would rather not have it as a class method personally. I believe Bob suggested creating a bucket type. That sounds reasonable and could go into 'collections' -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4