Tim Peters wrote: > For the reasons given before, that won't happen. The analysis I gave was > based on a complete understanding of every gory detail of how Python's gc > works -- there's simply nothing risky about this change wrt gc performance. > Empirical validation is unnecessary <wink>. > > If people want to surprise us, better they spend time writing nasty new > tests of weakref subclassing! Why can I forsee the strings "garbage collector" and "subclasses of weakrefs", along with "discovered in Zope3", appearing in the 2.4.1 2.4.2 and 2.4.3 release announcements? <0.5 wink> Anthony
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4