Russell> I would rather focus on the heart of PEP 318 and try to make class and
Russell> static methods easier to declare, e.g. something like:
Russell> def classmethod foo(self, ...):
Russell> If one supports arbitrary modifier functions and lists of
Russell> modifier functions I think readability is really going to
Russell> suffer.
-1. If you tie the specific decorators into the language syntax I think you
will find it too limiting in the long run (perhaps even in the short run).
I suspect many of the planned uses for such an extension will not simply be
to define class or static methods.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4