RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 24 05:29:38 EST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-February/042697.html

On Feb 24, 2004, at 5:18 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

> Moore, Paul wrote:
>> If curry() gets screams of outrage, someone suggested bind() to 
>> follow the
>> Boost C++ library's usage. That's tolerable, although I find it too 
>> generic
>> a word.
>
> I suspect bind() would have too many people looking for the nearest 
> TCP/IP stack. . .

In a "functional" module?

Jeremy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-February/042697.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 309, function currying