Armin Rigo wrote: > Unfortunately, the existence of the PyList_GET_XXX macros means that perfectly > legal extension modules would break if you do something like changing the > order of the fields. Is it more important to try and keep binary > compatibility for these 99%, or to force a reproducible segfault in the > remaining 1%? I think Python 2.4 might be binary-incompatible with 2.3, anyway. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4