Anthony Baxter wrote: > The library docs for, e.g. xmllib already say deprecated at the top - maybe > it should be larger? I think it would be better to *remove* the xmllib documentation. Existing code which needs the module will continue to work even without documentation, and new code is unlikely to be written for a module that has no documentation, and where importing the module gives a DeprecationWarning. > Alternately, we could lock the folks complaining about the stdlib's state > in a room with the folks who complain that every new thing has "wrecked > the language that they knew and loved" and let them fight it out. That sounds like a fair and democratic way of solving the issue. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4