On Aug 18, 2004, at 3:51 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: > > Is @syntax really SO horrible that you propose that we make decorators > near useless to most but more "aesthetically pleasing" to some? That's kind of a loaded question. I don't think that this simpler syntax is "near useless." It fulfills pretty much all of the problems that the original PEP aimed to fix. And, I don't mean to be rude, but yes the @syntax is that horrible. > Do you use a significant amount of decorators now? I used them enough to write the PEP in the first place, and I would use them even more if there were a better syntax for them. > Do you plan to use them much in the future? It seems to me that most > people who argue against the sensible and flexible syntaxes are the > same people who will rarely if ever use decorators at all... Kevin Smith Kevin.Smith at sas.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4