Kevin Smith wrote: > def classmethod foo(x, y, z): > pass > > That's it. Indeed, that is form F (5.13) in http://www.python.org/moin/PythonDecorators So this proposal is not new, and has the advantages and disadvantages listed in the Wiki. The main reason to reject it (AFAICT) is the similarity to monstrosities such as "public final synchronized void foo()". Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4