> As a point of interest, are Python 3.0 and Python 3000 actually the > same thing? In my mind, yes. > Python 3000 is clearly some hypothetical version at some > unspecified time in the future, which may or may not ever exist. But > at the rate version numbers are going, we're going to actually get to > 3.0 before very long. So, when we talk about 3.0, are we talking about > a wish version or a real version? Actually, with one minor version number bump per 12-18 months, we should have at least 5 years before we're at 2.9. So I think we can continue to equate 3.0 and 3000. It would be nice PR to actually call it "Python 3000" rather than "Python 3.0" when it comes out -- showing we can play the marketing game as well as anybody without losing our sense of humor. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4