Robert Brewer wrote: > Michael Sparks wrote: > >>As for whether it's the right keyword or not, I'm not sure >>I'm qualified to >>say, but decorators seem much more like declarations of >>function properties >>in all the use cases I've seen. > > The proposal, in effect, creates a declarative suite as opposed to the > more traditional imperative suite. Perhaps "declare:" would be more > appropriate (but give your brain a week to mull it over ;). I'm still a fan of 'predef:' if a keyword is going to be involved. The only thing I've seen so far that is common to all decorators is that they are predefining things about a 'def' we haven't encountered yet :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | Eugene, Oregon Email: ncoghlan at email.com | USA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4