Guido van Rossum wrote: > Please remember the procedure. The community is to come up with *one* > alternative that they universally prefer over @decorators; otherwise, > @decorators-before-def will stay. (I'll even give you *two* if the > community can agree that both are acceptable and really wishes to let > me pick one.) And yet in the poll to gain support for one option, we've been actively discouraged by Anthony from participating on the grounds that "weight of opinion" is no good ... ;) (No - not an accusation - just a suggestion that the procedure is possibly not clear to all the major participants). Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4