Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:01:47PM +1200 in <200408090001.i7901lsx005666 at cosc353.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>, Greg Ewing <greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> spake: >IxokaI <ixokai at gmail.com>: >> '"define methy1 at staticmethod" is wrong, but "at >> staticmethod define methy2" is right. >Pardon? They *both* sound like utter nonsense to me. >That's the other main objection I have to '@'. I just >can't help pronouncing it in my head as "at". Try pronouncing it as "attribute" (n.) or "attribute" (v.). Either one makes sense in context. -- <a href="http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~kamikaze/"> Mark Hughes </a> "Doing the impossible makes us mighty." -Captain Malcolm Reynolds, Firefly
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4