RetroSearch Browse

Sun Aug 8 15:11:37 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047348.html

On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-1] "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:

>Roman Suzi wrote:
>
>> As for the problems, I do not agree that decorators visually mix with
>> arguments: it is not a problem with +-s and *-s in an expression or other
>> similar cases. Also: heavily decorated function/method probably tells
>> that something is wrong with it's design.
>
>There is another drawback of course: it does not have an implementation.

Well, GvR convinced me decorators-before-def are needed, thus
leaving my proposal void.

However, I am not happy with those @s.

>Regards,
>Martin

Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
-- 
rnd at onego.ru =\= My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047348.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators