RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 7 01:29:39 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047219.html

Neil Schemenauer wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:28:13PM +0200, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> 
>>On 5-aug-04, at 21:17, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
>>
>>>  def funcname(...):
>>>     ...
>>>  funcname.signature = "v@:@i"
>>
>>That should be workable for this specific example.
> 
> 
> Even nicer if '_' is bound to the last function defined.
> 
>     class SomeClass(objc):
>         def funcname(...):
>            ...
>         _.signature = "v@:@i"

What if, by some special magic, the *next* function defined
were bound to '_' ? This would give us the desired prefix
behavior.

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047219.html below:

[Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators