RetroSearch Browse

Fri Aug 6 16:45:51 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047112.html

[Anthony]
> I'm having trouble finding a single piece from you where you
> outline the problems you have with the [decorators] after args,
> before :. Could you possibly post a message to python-dev
> stating your problems with it? It's the major one I've been
> unable to find your objections to.

And nobody else has expressed their objections to it either? :-)

Just look at it when either the list of decorators or the argument
list doesn't fit on one line:

class C(object):

    def longMethodNameForEffect(longArgumentOne=None,
                                longArgumentTwo=42) [
        staticmethod,
        funcattrs(grammar="'@' dotted_name [ '(' [arglist] ')' ]",
                  status="experimental", author="BDFL")
        ]:
        """This method blah, blah.

        It supports the following arguments:
	- longArgumentOne -- a string giving ...
        - longArgumentTwo -- a number giving ...

	blah, blah.

	"""
        raise NotYetImplemented

That's a total jumble of stuff ending with a smiley.  (True story: I
left out the colon when typing up this example and only noticed in
proofing.)

Problems with this form:

- it hides crucial information (e.g. that it is a static method)
  after the signature, where it is easily missed

- it's easy to miss the transition between a long argument list and a
  long decorator list

- it's cumbersome to cut and paste a decorator list for reuse, because
  it starts and ends in the middle of a line

Given that the whole point of adding decorator syntax is to move the
decorator from the end ("foo = staticmethod(foo)" after a 100-line
body) to the front, where it is more in-your-face, it should IMO be
moved all the way to the front.

(If I could design a language from scratch, I might want to move
docstrings to before the 'def' as well; I've come to appreciate this
in Java code.  Fredrik Lundh's PythonDoc also uses comments prefixing
the method definition; he also uses @ so he should be happy with this
syntax, as he seemed to be when I mentioned it to him at EuroPython.)

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047112.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: def fn (args) [dec,dec]: