RetroSearch Browse

Fri Aug 6 00:38:20 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046986.html

Edward K. Ream wrote:
> Oh dear.  Does this mean that @x is a potential annotation for any
> identifier x?  

Yes. Take a look at the documentation, and the test case.

> I was using __future__ by way of explanation.  I do hope namespaces could
> somehow denote annotations.  My off-the-cuff suggestion was for
> pseudo-modules, so maybe the normal module rules could be sidestepped?

I don't see how this would be possible. The plan is that arbitrary 
callables can be used as decorations, as long as they take a single
argument.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046986.html below:

[Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318