RetroSearch Browse

Thu Aug 5 19:46:19 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046886.html

> IMO, the most common uses of decorators will be to define properties,
> and class and static methods.  IMO, these uses would be better served
> by a simpler syntax:
> 
>   def classmethod foo(cls, ...):
>       ...
> 
> This simplified syntax only allows names to specify decorators.  It
> could allow multiple names, although I'm not sure it should,
> 
> I find this *far* more readable and obvious than any of the other syntaxs
> I've seen propsed.

Agreed.

> Those applications that *need* decorator arguments could use the more
> complex pie-shaped notation.

I wouldn't care to define a decorator function to introduce arguments,
and force every decorator function to take a single argument.

-- 
Gustavo Niemeyer
http://niemeyer.net

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046886.html below:

[Python-Dev] Plea for simpler decorator syntax, in addition to pie-shaped syntax