On Apr 24, 2004, at 10:58 AM, Peter Harris wrote: > Michael Chermside wrote: > >> How do we go about asking >> people to try it out (is a mention by Guido on comp.lang.python >> sufficient)? >> >> -- Michael Chermside >> >> > I'll play with generator expressions gladly. I have been using list > comprehensions like mad, even in cases where I suspect a generator > would be better. Also, I have a few uses of generators that might look > clearer as generator expressions. So I'd be more than happy to make a > test version of my current projects using generator expressions, just > to see when they can make the code clearer, and whether there is > anything about the semantics that trips me up too easily. > > I don't think my data sets are going to be big enough to test > performance, just usability. > > Now, if someone checks in the implementation of PEP309 too <hint>, I > would be as happy as a biscuit... Well, I'm +1 on PEP309. I regularly wish I had partial function application in Python. I also plan to experiment with generator expressions sooner than later. -bob
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4