[Tim Peters] #- [Batista, Facundo] #- > ... #- > - Methods like round() don't need to be discussed: the #- Spec defines #- > how them work, and the PEP is for implementing the PEP. #- #- Actually, there is no round() operation in the spec. I #- don't remember #- whether there used to be, but there definitely isn't now. You're right. My fault. #- Doesn't mean we #- can't supply .round(), does mean we have to spell out what #- it does. I #- assume decimal.round(whatever) acts the same as the spec's #- decimal.plus() #- would act if "whatever" were temporarily (for the duration #- of plus()) folded #- into context. If so, that's all it needs to say. Well, I think we must decide how it works With: >>> d = Decimal('12345.678') >>> d Decimal( (0, (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), -3) ) >>> str(d) '12345.678' And being the syntax Decimal.round(n), we have the following options: a) n is the quantity of relevant digits of the final number (must be non negative). >>> d.round(4) Decimal( (0, (1, 2, 3, 5), 1L) ) >>> str(d.round(4)) '1.235E+4' b) n has the same behaviour that in the built in round(). >>> d.round(1) Decimal( (0, (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7), -1L) ) >>> str(d.round(1)) '12345.7' >>> d.round(-1) Decimal( (0, (1, 2, 3, 5), 1L) ) >>> str(d.round(-1)) '1.235E+4' What option do you all like more? . Facundo
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4