RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 19 16:01:46 EDT 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/044446.html

On Monday 19 April 2004 03:00 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
 > This 'bug' (and those already filed) could be minimally/temporarily
 > disposed of by adding a page 'Modules Not Otherwise Documented' with the
 > list and one sentence for each (plus status if discouraged/deprecated/etc)

There's already a whole chapter like that; I'd really rather the modules get 
documented than addiing to that, but listing them there is better than 
releasing them without any docs.

  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/044446.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Possible modules that could use docs