"Batista, Facundo" <FBatista at uniFON.com.ar> writes: [...] > Actually, imposing the limit means more code and complexity, and I don't > find any benefit. But as I answered to Paul, I'm searching for community > agreement before changing functionality that I found in the implementation [...] > So, while Decimal(25) == 25 is True, hash(Decimal(25)) should be equal to > hash(25). > > The detail is that you can NOT compare Decimal to floats or strings, so > maybe we should not worry about them to give the same hashes. > > I'm OK to make hash(int or long) == hash(Decimal(int or long)). But only to > int or long, not float nor string. > > Do you agree? So far, I've found your instincts to be pretty good. I'd say 1. Remove the limits. 2. Make hashes the same for int/long, but not str/float. 3. While I'm at it, I'm OK with the names you suggest for the 3 extra functions. Paul. -- This signature intentionally left blank
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4