On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:55, Aahz wrote: > > I think they belong in every module. A future statement is a compiler > > gimmick and modules are compiled separately, so each module ought to > > have its own future statement. If not, the compiler (and human reader) > > have no idea whether a future statement is in effect. Obviously, the > > compiler and the reader could learn about some change to import > > semantics by studying context, but that's extra complexity I'd like to > > avoid (particular in the case of the compiler). > > That's what I expected the reaction to be from others. Barry, if you > want your change, lobby Guido. ;-) I might be crazy but I'm not insane. :) -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4