RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 7 00:14:21 EDT 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/044147.html

> Done.  Seems that the final remaining issue is the meaning of "." 
> inside __init__.py -- does it refer to the current package or the
> parent?  Guido, if you don't want to Pronounce, I'll post to c.l.py
> requesting feedback.

It ought to refer to the current package.  After all, in __init__.py,
relative imports (today) also work the same way as inside other
modules of that package.

__init__.py is funny that way (funny strange, not funny ha ha :-): its
__dict__ namespace is that of the package, i.e. the parent of the
package's submodules; but its location in the package tree is
equivalent to that of a submodule of the package.  That's just how it
is, and once you think about it long enough that's the only way it
*can* be.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/044147.html below:

[Python-Dev] Some comments on PEP 328 (absolute/relative imports)