Phillip J. Eby wrote: > On the other hand, *no* syntax proposed so far has been really that nice to > look at when used for multiple decorators. I agree completly here. Add to it that understanding the semantics of applying multiple decorators might not always be easy in case of a problem (which is a very common sitatuation for a programmer). Maybe this hints at thinking about syntaxes that don't neccesarily work for multiple decorators but work well for one decorator? After all the main point of introducing descriptor syntax seems to be that they should visually come closer to the 'def' statement line and not that multiple decorators are a common problem. cheers, holger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4