At 06:02 PM 4/1/04 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: >No, that's a misunderstanding.. it was by coincidence alone that the last >example I gave had two callbacks with an identical type signature. Using >a "with" block for decorators is as nonsensical as this: > >with args(x): > > def foo: > pass > > def bar: > pass I'm not sure I'd go that far. For 'classmethod' it can actually be attractive to group a bunch of them together. On the other hand, that's the only use case that comes to mind for grouping a bunch of functions under the same decorator list.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4