Skip Montanaro wrote: > I've given that a little more thought. Instead of encumbering the factory > functions which implement the old API with an optional dbenv argument, I > think if people want to provide their own environment it's reasonable to > expect them to use the new bsddb3 API. All we should do with the old API is > make it work in a multi-threaded environment if possible. But wouldn't that precisely involve creating environments? If you merely propose that the environment is not a parameter - +1. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4