>>> Barry Warsaw wrote > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 18:07, Skip Montanaro wrote: > > I've given that a little more thought. Instead of encumbering the factory > > functions which implement the old API with an optional dbenv argument, I > > think if people want to provide their own environment it's reasonable to > > expect them to use the new bsddb3 API. All we should do with the old API is > > make it work in a multi-threaded environment if possible. > > +1 > -Barry I'm +1 on this as well, but with the caveat that if we _can't_ make it work reliably in a MT environment, we should either decline the opportunity to mangle the user's data, or at _least_ issue a warning. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4