Martin v. Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > "Jason R. Mastaler" <jason at mastaler.com> writes: > > > > I don't think the problem is severe; os.fsync is rarely used. > > > > How did you arrive at this notion? > > >From four considerations: [...] > 3. To use it, you have to worry about data getting on the disk - > this really requires some kind of expert application. Yes, like delivering mail, or writing to a database, or doing any of a thousand other tasks that use the filesystem to store and synchronize data. os.fsync() breakage is a /big/ problem, particularly because the resulting traceback makes users think the application is broken, not the interpreter. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <python at discworld.dyndns.org> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4