Guido van Rossum writes: > That doesn't fit in the numbering scheme, it would have to be 2.3.2. > Given the amount of traffic about this I'm tempted to agree that we > need to move quickly and issue a fix for this issue (only). I think the documentation versioning problem should be fixed as well. I presume we can start making changes to the release23-maint branch now? -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4