[Guido] >> That doesn't fit in the numbering scheme, it would have to be 2.3.2. >> Given the amount of traffic about this I'm tempted to agree that we >> need to move quickly and issue a fix for this issue (only). [Anthony Baxter] > We really should fix the HP/UX build problem as well. That sounds dangerous to me: there's *always* an HP/UX build problem, if you count (as I do) getting threads to work. Every release, some HP/UX user submits a patch that breaks the build for other HP/UX users. So unless we've got a bona fide HP/UX expert on tap now (do we? that would be way cool <wink>), don't hold up solving a clear and widespread Linux problem by waiting for one to appear.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4