On 25-sep-03, at 5:20, Anthony Baxter wrote: > > Mea maxima culpa. I'll add a new section to the start of PEP101 and > PEP102 > about communicating with the appropriate people directly. Don't worry: I assume there's no harm done, and otherwise I'll just lobby for a quick 2.3.2. > We had a bunch of testers try out the release candidates on various > Mac OS X > releases - they reported no breakages. There's also been few/no > checkins > to the Mac-specific chunks of the tree for the release23-maint branch. There's a couple of version numbers that would have been nice to update, in the various .plist files. In other words, if you build 2.3.1 from source with a framework build then "Show Info" on the applications will show them to be 2.3, not 2.3.1. Same for the Apple Help Book that is built in to the IDE. > I'm happy to store up checkins for the 23 branch for a couple of weeks > to > give you time to do a release if you so wish (consider it penance for > my > forgetting to email you). No, don't worry. I'm going to skip 2.3.1 for MacPython-OS9. I'll catch up again with 2.3.2. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen at cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4