On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 08:33, Anthony Baxter wrote: > D'oh! Since it's only a failure of the test code (not the module itself) > I'll add a note to the bugs page in the test section. +1 > Jeff Epler's fix seems appropriate. There's always 2.3.2 - since 2.4 is still > a fair way off, it seems likely that a 2.3.2 sometime around January would be > appropriate. Of course, if the bsddb3 weirdness does actually turn out to be > something more serious, it might be sooner. +1 > who-uses-bsddb-anyway-just-those-zope-guys-<wink>, Just a bunch of anti-spam weirdos. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4