>>> Michael Hudson wrote > Um. Has someone done the 'reading through cvs logs' ritual for 2.3.1? > It's tedious, but valuable. In particular, I'm not *certain* all the > results of the refleak fixing spree got backported, and some of them > should probably acquire NEWS entries. I'm not sure I want to promise > being able to do this in the next twelve hours... I did a bit of a scan, and I think most of them are in. I'll have another look tomorrow morning. At this point I'd like to say "please hold off on changes to the release23-maint branch, unless you're involved in the release process." -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4