"Tim Peters" <tim at zope.com> writes: > Or is there an implicit assumption that Py_UNICODE is always an > unsigned type (in which case, why isn't the literal 256U? Likely, the author of the code was subconsciously assuming so. However, that assumption is invalid, and sharing should only happen for ordinals in range(256). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4