On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 11:03, Neal Norwitz wrote: > I think 2.3 has been great! There were a few memory leaks plugged. > I don't even recall any crashes specific to 2.3. I'm very happy with > the apparent robustness of 2.3. Maybe nobody is using it? :-) I'm using it for everything, and I agree! It's a very solid release. I still think we should plan for a 2.3.1 soonish, but the hold up may just be finding a release manager to own it. I'd rather spread the love this time. :) > As far as the release schedule for 2.4, I haven't heard any squawking > recently about Python changing too fast. We can't let that stand, now can we? :) Maybe Guido can post about his big plans for 2.4. There's still time to get PEPpy too. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4