On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:57:02AM -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > > We should also make a plan for a 2.3 maintenance release. There have > been a lot of checkins, but I haven't gotten a sense for how significant > the bugs were. I think 2.3 has been great! There were a few memory leaks plugged. I don't even recall any crashes specific to 2.3. I'm very happy with the apparent robustness of 2.3. Maybe nobody is using it? :-) As far as the release schedule for 2.4, I haven't heard any squawking recently about Python changing too fast. But then again, I have no time to read c.l.p anymore. Maybe there's a correlation? :-) Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4