[Andrew Kuchling] > I'd be in favor of setting an arbitrary date for a 2.4 release, and > when that date rolls around stabilizing and releasing the CVS tree, > no matter what's been implemented or not implemented. If we've made > major language revisions by that time, fine, but it's worthwhile even > if 2.4 is just 2.3 + (various bugfixes deemed too risky for 2.3.1) + > (a few new modules). > > PEP 320 estimates February 2005, a 19-month gap matching that between > 2.2 and 2.3. That seems a bit too long, especially if there are no > large changes that require testing; aiming for autumn 2004, beginning > to freeze in August, seems reasonable. I'd like to see 2.4 released no later than 29-Jul-2004. That's a year after 2.3 got released. I don't have nearly as many years left to me as most of you do <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4