Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Since Tim thinks it's okay to change (and since I now know what the OP > wanted) you have my blessing to give this a try. > OK. I will go with Tim's suggestion and just do the brain-dead PySequence_Fast/PySequence_Fast_GET_ITEM substitution solution and not bother with the PyObject_GetIter/PyIter_Next solution. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4