Martin> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>> Feedback appreciated.
Martin> I think we need to build bsddb185 automatically under certain
Martin> conditions. I have encouraged a user to submit a patch in that
Martin> direction.
I suppose that's an alternative, however, it is complicated by a couple
issues:
* The bsddb185 module would have to be built as bsddb (not a big deal in
and of itself).
* The current bsddb package directory would have to be renamed or not
installed to avoid name clashes.
I don't think there's a precedent for the second issue. The make install
target installs everything in Lib. I think The decision about whether the
package or the module gets installed would be made in setup.py. The
coupling between the two increases the complexity of the process. I smell
an ugly hack in the offing.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4