> Where was this agreed upon? Perhaps I overstepped. It's been on my todo list for a couple of months and didn't seem to be even slightly controversial. > __iter__ returning self doesn't sound very generic to me, > so at the very least the name should be changed IMO. Thomas suggested PyObject_GetSelfIter, PyObject_GenericSelfIter, or PyObject_SelfIter. Consistent with the other tp_slot fillers, I suggest PyObject_GenericIter. > Also, adding a standard API for a helper function this > trivial doesn't really make sense to me. This identical code was duplicated in a dozen different modules in the same context. It comes up when writing most iterators and needed to be factored out. Raymond Hettinge
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4