Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-March/033970.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] bsddb3 test errors - are these expected?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Someone I work with recently caused a test to start asserting in VC7's
instrumented free() call, using a pydebug build.  He explained the
change this way:

"I switched from PyObject_New to PyObject_NEW, which according to it's
documentation omits the check for type_object != 0 and consequently
should run a little bit faster"

[he doesn't ever pass 0 as the typeobject]

Did he miss some other important fact about PyObject_NEW? Does the
doc need to be fixed?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] bsddb3 test errors - are these expected?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4