A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-June/036252.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal to drop f_tstate

[Python-Dev] Proposal to drop f_tstate [Python-Dev] Proposal to drop f_tstateGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:25:54 -0400
> >>Therefore, I hereby propose to remove this frame field,
> >>in order to save space.
> ...
> 
> > I notice that all the places that use f_tstate are functions that get
> > a frame passed in.  What makes you believe that those always run in
> > the same thread where the frame was created?
> 
> Schluck!
> I assumed that f_tstate was just some cache, and one would
> never try to look into a different thread.
> This was a wrong assumption.

I don't know that it is.  I just don't know that it isn't, either.

> Sorry, I will und my changes, ASAP.

Where did you make any changes?

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4